docx, 777.54 KB
docx, 777.54 KB
jpg, 131.2 KB
jpg, 131.2 KB
jpg, 301.92 KB
jpg, 301.92 KB
jpg, 276.95 KB
jpg, 276.95 KB

Complete Handout/Worksheet on General Defences in English Law.

Written by an experienced Law examiner and used many times in classes of my own, obtaining excellent results.

This is a 25-page workbook which includes questions and highlighted key points and cases.

There is an accompanying Worksheet of review questions in addition to this Worksheet.

Here’s a summary of the document:

The document provides an overview of various general defences in English law, including Automatism, Insanity, Duress, Intoxication, Consent, and Self-Defense/Prevention of Crime.

  • Automatism: Automatism is divided into non-insane and self-induced automatism.
  • Insanity: Insanity is governed by the M’Naghten Rules, which require proving a defect of reason caused by a disease of the mind, leading to a lack of understanding of the nature and quality of the act or its wrongfulness.
  • Duress: Duress involves committing a crime under the threat of death or serious bodily harm.
  • Intoxication: Intoxication can be a defense for specific intent crimes if it prevents the formation of mens rea.
  • Consent: Consent is generally not a defense for causing actual bodily harm, except in cases of implied consent in sports or medical procedures.
  • Self-Defense/Prevention of Crime: Self-defense allows the use of reasonable force to protect oneself, others, or property.
  • Automatism vs. Insanity: The distinction between automatism and insanity often lies in whether the cause is external (automatism) or internal (insanity), leading to different legal outcomes.
  • Duress by Threats vs. Duress of Circumstances: Duress by threats involves direct threats forcing D to commit a crime, while duress of circumstances involves committing a crime to avoid imminent harm.
  • Voluntary vs. Involuntary Intoxication: Voluntary intoxication is self-induced and generally not a defense for basic intent crimes, while involuntary intoxication can be a defense if it negates mens rea.
  • Proportionality in Self-Defence: The use of force in self-defense must be reasonable and proportional to the threat; excessive force invalidates the defence.

An excellent resource for any AS or A Level Law student.

Reviews

Something went wrong, please try again later.

This resource hasn't been reviewed yet

To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it

Report this resourceto let us know if it violates our terms and conditions.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.