Pozzulo et al. (line-ups)

Hello, I've checked someone of the resources relating to this study on your website and seem to have found a glitch or typo. The Procedure of the Pozzulo et al, study contains notes of the Holzel et al study. I wasn't sure how I could contact you in regards that, but thank you for the resources you've uploaded

Thank you for your work!

Heya, Thank you for these resources. I thought to share a couple of things I have picked up on that you may want to consider editing. In your Qs about ethics, your answer to deception is not correct or clear. The answer says the following: Deception: There was no deception in this study, the participants were told that the study was concerned with memory. There was deception in this study as the experimenters were really investigating the social effects (stress/pressure) on memory. However the original study does say that both adults and children were told differing aims about the study, so deception was used ( children told study was about TV shows and games and adult participants told study was about memory) Also this answer for this question unfortunately is not very coherent nor answering the question and you may want to consider editing it: Outline one piece of information from this study that supported the nature side of the debate and one piece of evidence that supports the nurture side of the debate. Was the question mistyped and intended to be 'outline one piece of information from this study that supports the individual/situational side of the debate? Other than this, thank you so much for sharing your resources for the syllabus changes

Thank you for the resources :) It is really supportive to plan my lessons