THIS IS A VERY TRICK SONG.
iT PROMPTED ME TO REWRITE MY PROGRAM.
i ADDED DOTS WERE NOTES WOULD BE CHANGED BY THE KEY SIGNATURE,
The song over rides or confirms these.
I THINK YOU SHOULD WRITE THESE DOWN ON A PIECE OF PAPER
EVEN THOUGH THE DOTS DO APPEAR IN THE RIGHT PLACES.
MY SONG’S VERSION DOES HAVE MISTAKES.
I HAVE SEEN SEVERAL ENGLISH WORD LISTS.
THEY HAVE WEAK SPOTS OR ARE TOTAL SHAMS.
HERE IS MINE AFTER LONG HOURS OF TOIL.
I’VE TRIED TO INCLUDE ON;Y ROOT FORM OF WORDS.
FOR EXAMPLE: GOVERNMENT NOT GOVERNMENTAL.
WOULD YOU PLEASE SENT ME SOME WORDS I’VE MISSED?
HERE ARE TEN VOCABULARY WORDS IN A SHORT STORY.
THE COMPUTER MAKES QUIZZES WITH THEM.
SEE HOW MANY YOU KNOW COLD.
THE COMPUTER MIXES QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TO MAKE UNIQUE
TESTS FOR EACH COMPUTER STATION.
HERE ARE TEN VOCABULARY WORDS USED IN A STORY.
QUESTIONS ARE GIVEN TO TEST YOU’RE KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORDS.
THE ORDER IS MIXED TO MAKE CHEATING LESS POSSIBLE.
New documents were recently disclosed.
An exhaustive list of ephemeral events was enumerated about the start of WW1.
People were dubious about enigmas surrounding why France and Germany went to war.
The old enmities had become dormant with a diminution of tensions.
It is the epitome of evil that the Kaiser endorsed the war.
New documents were recently been made public.
A thorough list of fleeting events was compiled about the start of WW1.
People were skeptical about puzzles surrounding why France and Germany went to war.
The old hatred had cooled down with a lessening of tensions.
It is the height of evil that the Kaiser was for the war.
THIS MINIQUIZ TESTS 10 VOCABULARY WORDS.
New documents were recently disclosed.
An exhaustive list of ephemeral events was enumerated about the start of WW1.
People were dubious about enigmas surrounding why France and Germany went to war.
The old enmities had become dormant with a diminution of tensions.
It is the epitome of evil that the Kaiser endorsed the war.
New documents were recently been made public.
A thorough list of fleeting events was compiled about the start of WW1.
People were skeptical about puzzles surrounding why France and Germany went to war.
The old hatred had cooled down with a lessening of tensions.
It is the height of evil that the Kaiser was for the war.
THIS MINIQUIZ TEACHES 10 VOCABULARY WORDS.
IT SHOWS A STORY AND TRANSLATION.
IT THEN POSES QUESTIONS BASED ON THE VOCABULARY USED.
IT IS A LITTLE QUIZ!
HERE IS A QUIZ ON 10 VOCABULARY WORDS.
THEY ARE PUT IN A STORY.
THERE IS A SIMPLIFIED VERSION.
THE WORDS ARE POSED AS QUESTIONS.
YOU WILL TAKE A PRETEST AND TEST TO SEE IF YOU KNOW THEM!
HERE IS A PROGRAM TO MAKE LITTLE QUIZZES.
YOU START WITH A SHORT PAGE OF FACTS YOU WRITE.
YOU THEN WRITE 2 PART QUESTIONS ABOUT THE INFORMATION.
THE COMPUTER WILL MIX THE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TO
MAKE QUIZZES YOU CAN GIVE ON THE COMPUTER.
When the trenches of WW1 became quiescent, the returning troops were
pervasively venerated for their exploits.
However; a scrutiny of the war led to reproving the tactics.
Experts ranted at the random nature of the decisions.
Generals rushed in or vacillated.
Emotions had often usurped sound military practice.
When the trenches of WW1 became quiet the returning troops were
universally worshiped for their deeds.
However; a review of the war led to criticizing the tactics.
Experts barked at the arbitrary nature of the decisions.
Generals rushed in or hesitated.
Emotions had often taken the place of solid military practice.
The exploits and debilities of the armies of WW1 afforded a knotty
training ground training ground for the new generals - the future
generals of WW2.
It was almost an aesthetic experience to realize new truths.
They worked surreptitiously on new ideas and regimens.
When they met each other, a cursory exchange of notes led to affirmation.
They concurred on what should be done the next time.
The adventures and weaknesses of the armies of WW1 provided a torturous
training ground training ground for the new generals - the future
generals of WW2.
It was almost a beautiful experience to realize new truths.
They worked secretly on new ideas and ways of doing things.
When they met each other, a brief exchange of notes led to recognition.
They agreed on what should be done the next time.
The formulaic approach to tactics by the hierarchy hindered progress.
Things did not fluctuate; it was a slaughter.
It kindled friction.
In juxtaposition was a new type of general; the founders of a new type of warfare.
They showed restraint, as their ideas were considered heresy.
The cookbook approach to running the war by the leadership slowed progress.
Things did not vary; it was a bloodbath.
It started controversy.
Side by side with them was a new type of general; the establishers of a new type of warfare.
They showed self-control, as their ideas were considered wrong.