HERE IS A PROGRAM TO MAKE LITTLE QUIZZES.
YOU START WITH A SHORT PAGE OF FACTS YOU WRITE.
YOU THEN WRITE 2 PART QUESTIONS ABOUT THE INFORMATION.
THE COMPUTER WILL MIX THE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS TO
MAKE QUIZZES YOU CAN GIVE ON THE COMPUTER.
When the trenches of WW1 became quiescent, the returning troops were
pervasively venerated for their exploits.
However; a scrutiny of the war led to reproving the tactics.
Experts ranted at the random nature of the decisions.
Generals rushed in or vacillated.
Emotions had often usurped sound military practice.
When the trenches of WW1 became quiet the returning troops were
universally worshiped for their deeds.
However; a review of the war led to criticizing the tactics.
Experts barked at the arbitrary nature of the decisions.
Generals rushed in or hesitated.
Emotions had often taken the place of solid military practice.
The exploits and debilities of the armies of WW1 afforded a knotty
training ground training ground for the new generals - the future
generals of WW2.
It was almost an aesthetic experience to realize new truths.
They worked surreptitiously on new ideas and regimens.
When they met each other, a cursory exchange of notes led to affirmation.
They concurred on what should be done the next time.
The adventures and weaknesses of the armies of WW1 provided a torturous
training ground training ground for the new generals - the future
generals of WW2.
It was almost a beautiful experience to realize new truths.
They worked secretly on new ideas and ways of doing things.
When they met each other, a brief exchange of notes led to recognition.
They agreed on what should be done the next time.
The formulaic approach to tactics by the hierarchy hindered progress.
Things did not fluctuate; it was a slaughter.
It kindled friction.
In juxtaposition was a new type of general; the founders of a new type of warfare.
They showed restraint, as their ideas were considered heresy.
The cookbook approach to running the war by the leadership slowed progress.
Things did not vary; it was a bloodbath.
It started controversy.
Side by side with them was a new type of general; the establishers of a new type of warfare.
They showed self-control, as their ideas were considered wrong.
THIS MINIQUIZ TESTS 10 VOCABULARY WORDS.
New documents were recently disclosed.
An exhaustive list of ephemeral events was enumerated about the start of WW1.
People were dubious about enigmas surrounding why France and Germany went to war.
The old enmities had become dormant with a diminution of tensions.
It is the epitome of evil that the Kaiser endorsed the war.
New documents were recently been made public.
A thorough list of fleeting events was compiled about the start of WW1.
People were skeptical about puzzles surrounding why France and Germany went to war.
The old hatred had cooled down with a lessening of tensions.
It is the height of evil that the Kaiser was for the war.
The intrepid partisans of WW2 France were intractable in the face of the Nazi occupation.
Their irreproachable judicious attacks made the Nazis irate.
The partisans wanted to invert the military situation.
The Freedom Fighters became inured to savage reprisals.
It is ironic that though innudated by superior forces, they became stronger.
The resolute underground fighters of WW2 France were staunch in the face of the Nazi occupation.
Their blameless well thought out attacks made the Nazis furious.
The citizen army wanted to turn around the military situation.
The Freedom Fighters became used to savage revenge measures.
It is the odd that though surrounded by superior forces,
they became stronger.
A BELOVED WW1 SONG.
LOAD THE PROGRAM.
TYPE IT’S A LONG WAY TO TIPPERARY.
IT HAS ONE PART.
YOU CAN PLAY IT WITH 12 DIFFERENT INSTRUMENTS.
YOU CAN USE THIS PROGRAM TO LOAD IN YOUR OWN SONGS.
IT IS A POINT AND CLICK PROGRAM.
YOU POINT AT NOTES.
IT WORKS WELL.
The atrophied US military faltered; figuratively falling flat on its face.
It made feasible flagrant acts like the burning of the White House!
The US had fanaticism (It is fallacious to think it did not try.)
After the war, the faculty of the new US military academy attributed
the failure to arbitrary wrong moves.
The weak US military stumbled; literally falling flat on its face.
It made possible outrageous acts like the burning of the White House!
The US had zeal (It is wrong to think it did not try.)
After the war, the staff of the new US military academy put the blame
for failure on random wrong moves.
When America contended with England in the War of 1812, things did not fluctuate;
it was a steady foundering - a ship wreak.
In juxtaposition, the two armies were very different.
The hierarchy of the USA’s was in chaos; friction kindled by disagreement.
This constraint hampered the war effort.
Things that might has improved the situation were considered heresy by the top brass.
When America fought with England in the War of 1812, things did not vary;
it was a steady sinking - a ship wreak.
In comparison side by side, the two armies were very different.
The leadership of the US’s was in confusion; conflict created by disagreement.
This restriction straight-jacketed the war effort.
Things that might has improved the situation were considered against doctrine by the top brass.
During the contention of the War of 1812, the US was hampered by a weak military.
The gravity of the situation could not be hidden by guile even to the most gullible
of US citizens.
Gratuitous acts like the burning of the White House were on display.
The labyrinthine political apparatus advocated concessions to England to get peace.
It was hypothetical to ask for a continuation of the war in the face of disaster.
During the struggle of the War of 1812, the US was held back by a weak military.
The seriousness of the situation could not be hidden by slight of hand even to the most believing
of US citizens.
Freely done acts like the burning of the White House were on display.
The laborious political machinery supported giving things up to England to get peace.
It was dishonest to ask for a prolongation of the war in the face of disaster.
The treaty ending the War of 1812 exemplifies a good deal.
The U.S. negotiators had cohesion.
They complied cogent coherent arguments for England giving the US a nice deal.
The cliche kid glove treatment comes to mind.
It was an exemplary deal made without coercion.
A lavish contract, handing over the Midwest to US control was finalized.
The treaty ending the War of 1812 is an example of a good deal.
The U.S. negotiators had unity.
They listed up logical clear arguments for England giving the US a nice deal.
The old image kid glove treatment comes to mind.
It was a great deal made without force.
A juicy contract, handing over the Midwest to US control was inked.
THIS IS A VERY TRICK SONG.
iT PROMPTED ME TO REWRITE MY PROGRAM.
i ADDED DOTS WERE NOTES WOULD BE CHANGED BY THE KEY SIGNATURE,
The song over rides or confirms these.
I THINK YOU SHOULD WRITE THESE DOWN ON A PIECE OF PAPER
EVEN THOUGH THE DOTS DO APPEAR IN THE RIGHT PLACES.
MY SONG’S VERSION DOES HAVE MISTAKES.
I HAVE SEEN SEVERAL ENGLISH WORD LISTS.
THEY HAVE WEAK SPOTS OR ARE TOTAL SHAMS.
HERE IS MINE AFTER LONG HOURS OF TOIL.
I’VE TRIED TO INCLUDE ON;Y ROOT FORM OF WORDS.
FOR EXAMPLE: GOVERNMENT NOT GOVERNMENTAL.
WOULD YOU PLEASE SENT ME SOME WORDS I’VE MISSED?
THIS IS STEPHAN FOSTER’S FIRST HIT.
IT IS ABOUT AS COUNTRY RACETRACK IN PRE-CIVIL WAR USA.
RUN THE PROGRAM.
TYPE CAMPTOWN RACES.
THIS SONG HAS ONE PART.