Lack of transparency around ‘shadowy’ RSCs ‘could open door to corruption’

Union calls for ‘clear bright light of transparent accountability’ to be shone on ‘shadowy’ RSCs and headteacher boards
10th April 2018, 9:32am

Share

Lack of transparency around ‘shadowy’ RSCs ‘could open door to corruption’

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/lack-transparency-around-shadowy-rscs-could-open-door-corruption
Thumbnail

The lack of transparency around “shadowy” and “unaccountable” regional schools commissioners and headteacher boards could allow “corrupt” and “nepotistic” practices to take place, a conference has heard.

Yesterday, at the conference of the ATL section of the NEU teaching union, delegates passed a motion asserting that there was “too much power and not enough accountability around the workings of the RSCs and headteacher boards”.

The eight RSCs are responsible for turning schools into academies and deciding who runs them. They are advised and challenged by eight headteacher boards.

Clare Kellett, a teacher from Somerset who proposed the motion, called RSCs and headteacher boards “shadowy organisations” with “real power”.

She said that under the current system, “a few local leaders know best how to run local education… not the parents, not the staff, not the students… unelected, unaccountable to you and me and in power”.

Danger of ‘empire-building and corruption’

Ms Kellett said the lack of transparency around these structures “might open the door to nepotism, empire building and even corruption”.

She went on: “Far from me to suggest that any of the RSCs or that anyone on the headteacher boards is corrupt - I’m not saying that - what I am saying is that the system would allow corrupt practices, nepotistic and secret decision-making, and there’s no accountability to the public whose money it is, whose children they are, whose schools they are.

“You’ve heard about the CEOs of fat cat multi-academy trusts - it’s not a fantasy, this idea that there’s money to be made from state education.

“The only thing to trust when trust in personal morality fails is the clear bright light of transparent accountability.”

Tes has repeatedly highlighted issues around the transparency of headteacher boards, and revealed that the Department for Education was unable to say how many people work for the RSCs

The conference passed a motion instructing the union’s executive to “investigate the practice” of RSCs and headteacher boards, and to “lobby the government to make the workings of the RSCs and headteacher boards transparent and accountable to Parliament and the public”.

Want to keep up with the latest education news and opinion? Follow Tes on Twitter and like Tes on Facebook

 

 

 

 

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared