Summer-born children are being unfairly labelled by primary schools as having special educational needs, research suggests.

Two in five summer-born boys are categorised as SEND (special educational needs and disabilities) by primary schools, creating needless anxiety for children and parents, according to a paper by the London School of Economics (LSE).

Among children who reached Year 6 in 2018, the study found that 26 per cent of summer-born girls were given SEND support at some point during primary school, compared with 16 per cent of autumn-born girls.

Meanwhile, 40 per cent of summer-born boys received SEND help, against 28 per cent of autumn-born boys.

EYFS: Summer-born fall 19 points behind peers in early years

Related: Summer-born children ‘should have test scores adjusted’

Background: Attainment gap for summer-born pupils ‘persists at age 11’

More LSE research: ‘Scrap maths ability groups at 7 to boost progression’

In Scotland: New move for school starting age to be raised to 7

Researchers analysed the National Pupil Database census records for more than 6 million children in state primary schools over the years 2008 to 2018.

On average, some 39 per cent of summer-born boys were ascribed a “good level of development” in the early years foundation stage (EYFS) profile at the end of Reception, compared with 80 per cent of autumn-born girls.

Summer-born pupils ‘more likely to be categorised as SEND’

Meanwhile, at the end of Year 1, 64 per cent of summer-born boys were recorded as meeting the “expected standard” in the phonics screening check, compared with 84 per cent of summer-born girls.

The disparities according to the season of birthday and gender were present throughout primary school, across cohorts of children, and were most pronounced between the ages of 6 and 8, the study says.

When the cohort of children who finished primary school in 2018 were in Year 2, some 8 per cent of autumn-born girls were attributed school-level SEND support, compared with 27 per cent of summer-born boys.

The author of the report, Dr Tammy Campbell, argues that England’s early testing and curriculum regimes are inappropriate, particularly for younger children.

They are set up to sort children into “expected” and “good” who “meet standards”, and those who are “deficient”, which results in over-attribution of SEND to summer-born children, Dr Campbell says.

The paper states: “Rigid prescriptive expectations not suitable for relatively younger children result in many of these children being denoted with SEND, and then the system that has created these needs cannot or will not meet them.

“This is because, inherently by the same conditions through which it creates some SEND, it is configured not to serve the children it attributes. It is configured instead to denote children as sufficient (good, meeting standards, expected level) or deficient (not good, not meeting standards, not at the expected level).”

She added that this “may contribute to increasing numbers of children being forced from the mainstream system”.

Data released by the Department for Education this month showed that the number of pupils in England with education, health and care (EHC) plans increased by 10 per cent from January 2020 to January 2021.

EHC plans identify a child’s educational, health and social needs, and set out what support the youngster should receive.

Dr Campbell, assistant research professor at LSE’s Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, said: “Beneath these numbers lie real children and families.

“The past decade’s SEND system reforms have not improved their experiences: the system remains insufficient, inefficient and unequal. More, and crucially, different reform, therefore, seems necessary.

“This is why it is important to continue to examine from all angles the factors that play into and construct the SEND system: which, as a whole, is characterised by ‘nightmares’ and ‘dashed hopes’, and which fails to serve the children it should be supporting.”

Under the current system, children in England usually start school in the autumn after they turn 4, but parents of those born between April and August can ask to delay entry for a year.

Figures published last year showed that the number of parents asking for their summer-born children to delay starting school had increased annually since 2016.

DfE statistics showed that 1.2 per cent of summer-born pupils delayed entry in January 2020, up from 1.0 per cent in January 2019.

Pauline McDonagh Hull, a spokesperson for the Summer Born Campaign, said: “This study reaffirms the disproportionate number of summer-born children with SEND in schools.

“One of the most important benefits of allowing compulsory school age entry is reducing new SEND diagnoses in summer-born children and improving the educational outcomes of those already diagnosed.

“While we have seen improvements in the admissions approach taken by some authorities, equity concerns remain, and it is vital the government communicates the legal right to start school at age 5 instead of age 4 to all parents.”