The best and worst performing multi-academy trusts in the country for progress after GCSEs have been revealed by the Department for Education.
Today it published new data on MATs’ “level 3 value-added” performance - the progress that pupils make between key stage 4 and graded level 3 qualifications, excluding tech levels.
Read: Key dates for 2019 GCSEs
Quick listen: GCSEs: Six podcasts to help support your pupils
Want to know more? GCSE exams 2019: Five pitfalls to avoid
The measure compares pupils’ results to those of other pupils nationally with similar prior attainment.
Academy trust progress scores
For all pupils nationally, the average progress score is zero, so a positive score means that pupils within the MAT on average do better than those with similar prior attainment nationally, whereas a negative score means that on average they do worse.
The top 10 MATs were:
- Diocese of London (0.13 value added)
- Inspiration Trust (0.12)
- Aldridge Education (0.12)
- Dixons Academy Trust (0.1)
- The Castle School Education Trust (0.08)
- The Thinking Schools Academy Trust (0.06)
- Oasis Community Learning (0.06)
- Ark Schools (0.04)
- East Midlands Education Trust (0.04)
- Invictus Education Trust (0.01)
The bottom 10 MATs were:
- Swale Academies Trust (-0.06)
- Rosedale Hewens Academy Trust (-0.53)
- E-ACT (-0.39)
- David Meller (-0.33)
- Aspirations Academies Trust (-0.28)
- City of London Academies Trust (-0.27)
- Creative Education Academies Trust (-0.25)
- Matrix Academy Trust (-0.22)
- Leigh Academy Trust (-0.22)
- Grace Foundation (-0.21)
MATs were only included in the analysis if they had more than three schools that had belonged to the trust for at least three years.
