Ofsted inspections should assess fair access to schools, the Sutton Trust has said, after its analysis found that poorer pupils are less likely to get into top-performing comprehensives.
The education charity is also urging schools to review their admissions policies after it found that more than 150 comprehensive secondary schools in England are more “socially selective” than the average grammar school, according to its research.
The Sutton Trust has said the government must review admissions code policies to ensure children eligible for the pupil premium are included in a school’s oversubscription priority criteria.
Its study looked at the top 500 secondary schools in England by the Attainment 8 measure - which assesses the achievement of a pupil across eight subjects at GCSE.
It found, on average, these top comprehensive schools took 40 per cent fewer pupils eligible for free school meals (FSM) than the average comprehensive school.
The research suggested that about a third of this gap is owing to the schools being located in more affluent areas, but two-thirds represent “some form of social selection within that area”.
These top comprehensive schools have 30 per cent fewer pupils eligible for FSM than live in their catchment areas, according to the Sutton Trust.
This could be down to a “complex mixture of factors” - including schools’ complicated admissions policies, parental decision making and degrees of parental agency, it added.
The Sutton Trust said this could be addressed if the government included an assessment of fair access in Ofsted inspections and addressed financial barriers such as transport and uniform costs.
Admission policies campaign
The charity added that it is set to launch a campaign urging school leaders to carry out reviews of their admissions policies.
Its research found that levels of social selection differed across England, with the lowest number of top schools concentrated in some parts of the country with the highest FSM rates.
In the North East, there has been an increasing level of FSM eligibility, fewer top comprehensive schools, and “increasing levels of social selectivity” in the top schools that they do have, it found.
Faith schools are also more likely to be “socially selective” than the non-religious top comprehensive schools, according to the report.
The research concluded: “This report finds little evidence to suggest that comprehensive schools are becoming less socially selective, strong evidence that things have not improved since 2017 and some clear evidence pointing to increasing levels of social selection in comprehensive admissions in some parts of the system.”
‘Deeply concerning’
Sir Peter Lampl, founder of the Sutton Trust, said: “The levels of social segregation across the school system are unacceptable.
“The poorest parts of the country are hit by a double whammy of having the fewest top comprehensive schools, which are also the most socially selective. This is deeply concerning.”
He added: “We need to urgently address this problem to create a more balanced system and raise the quality of all schools.
“The government should review the school admissions code to ensure all state schools take a mix of pupils, which reflects their local community and provides disadvantaged pupils with a fair chance to access top-performing schools.”
‘Not just about admissions practices’
Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said the union supported the charity’s call for a review of the school admissions code and their plans for a fairer admissions campaign.
He added: “Fairer access is not just about admissions practices. It is also about ensuring that all schools have the support and resources they need to provide a high-quality education wherever they are and whatever their context.
“Currently, we have an inspection system which often actively damages schools that face the greatest challenges by the application of negative ratings, which make it more difficult to recruit staff and pupils.
“This means these schools are particularly badly affected by national teacher shortages and funding pressures, which, in turn, makes improvement harder to secure.”
A Department for Education spokesperson said: “The School Admissions Code requires admission arrangements to be fair, clear and objective, and no child should be unfairly disadvantaged.
“Admission authorities can choose to prioritise children eligible for the pupil premium when they are over their published admission number according to the need of their local area.”
For the latest education news and analysis delivered directly to your inbox every weekday morning, sign up to the Tes Daily newsletter
